For a long time, the challenging issue of lampoon opposition and especially the gross political lampoon with the religious and moral values has been considered by both the jurists and the poets committed to ethical and religious principles. Accordingly, it was not thought that this kind of lampoon, which is usually associated with insulting and exaggerated expressions of ugliness, would lead to the poetry of poets who consider themselves as followers of The Household. But contrary to this notion, there are many verses in Shiite political poetry that such a lampoon obviously has been used in them. This article aims to use the descriptive-analytic method and focusing on the Daliyeh ode of Seyed Heidar Helli to examine and criticize what might be permissible for the use of this kind of lampoon by the poet. In this regard, after reviewing the principle of the use of lampoon on the basis of Islamic criteria, the criticism of the lampoon in this ode and the possible justifications for it are analyzed. The result of this research suggests that, although some of the Quran's descriptive forms, along with some Arabic rhetorical forms, can be used to justify the use of this lampoon, but given the far-fetched reason for this justification to the common audiences using it is not without difficulty. For this reason, although the poet in this ode clearly used a gross political lampoon, but in other Hawliat he tried to avoid it, and instead use other methods of lampoon.

The paper offers a distinctive reading of Popper’s work, suggesting that his Logic of Scientific Discovery (LScD) might be re-interpreted in the light of his Open Society. Indeed, Popper can be interpreted as criticising certain aspects of his first book, and as a result improving upon them, in his second. It suggests translating what Popper says about ‘conventions’ into his later vocabulary of ‘social institutions’. Looking back, I believe that Popper never intended the language of conventions and decisions to be read individualistically. I remain unsure whether Popper was himself quite as clear about this as he could have been.  My reading makes Popper a pioneer in the sociology of science. Scientific institutions are arenas of political power; but Popper did not discuss the structure and inter-relations of the social institutions of science, or offer a politics of science in the context of his methodology. What is missing from the skeletal sociology of LScD is the politics. We could put it in Popperian terms this way: scientific institutions are both open and closed. They are closed, firmly, to the inexpert, to the non-members; supposedly they are open to the qualified, provided the prerogatives of seniority and leadership are acknowledged. Despite these shortcomings, Popper’s critical and rational approach and his insistence on openness and intellectual honesty are still important today.

Arabic literature has long been blessed with a kind of poetry called lampoon in which the poet portrays ugly characteristics of an individual or a group. Gradually, the scope of this kind of poetry has been drawn to political literature, as in the works by the poets of the Umayyad Party, such as Akhtal and Meskin Daremi, and Ahwas, as well as Shiite poets. Some examples of this kind of poems can also be found in the poems of such poets as Komeit bin Zaid Asadi, Seyed Ismail Hemyari, and Da'bal Khazaee. This paper uses a descriptive method based on statistical data to study this kind of poetry in the satirical poems of Seyed Heidar Helli and seeks to introduce the various political lampoons used in this kind of poetry. It also tries to answer the question of why the poet is more inclined to use the "history-based lampoons" either directly or implicitly. The results of this study suggest that the political lampoons used in these satirical poem, either the direct or the indirect ones, can be divided into three categories: 1. Exaggerated lampoons, 2. lampoons laced with praise, and 3. History-based lampoons, the reason for the poet's desire to prefer the third category being its persuasive function because of its resort to historical data as well as the harmony of this type of lampoons to ethical and religious principles.

Among the artistic styles of language, satire and its derivations, with objecting and criticizing approach, have been popular in the language and literature of different tribes and nations since a long time ago. The satire, humor and lampoon, each with a different quality, is the result of the behavior contrasts between the society and the individuals. Each of the linguistic elements and expression styles is tangible and perceivable in the consecutive warp and woof of the poetry and literature of Iran. In the classic Persian poetry, a considerable volume of the works of some poets, especially between the 5th and 6th centuries, is consisting of humor and lampoon. One of these poets is Sanaei Ghaznavi, whose poems with veins of criticism and objection have been seriously impressed by humor and lampoon and veins of satire. The nervosusness and social objection of Sanaei's satire is reflected in his odes and other poems with flavor of lampoon and humor and even his Hadighah, which is the climax his ideas and thoughts with divine view and Gnostic themes, is not deprived from the flavor of satire, humor and lampoon and a considerable amount of Chapter 9of this book, is smeared with obscene and chastity lampoon and humor. The fact that what has been the background a paradoxical approach, is the question which is being answered in the present article.

Purpose: Food security is a critical global challenge that is influenced by research and innovation in the field. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the scientific output of developing countries in food security and examine its relationship with patents and Gross Domestic Product (GDP).Methodology: This applied research utilized the Scientometric approach. A total of 8,416 papers published between 1992-2023 in the field of food security by developing countries were included in the study using citation databases from Clarivate Analytics. Additionally, patent registrations from the WIPO database and GDP data from the World Bank were analyzed. Information was collected through note-taking, and the data was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.Findings: The findings reveal an upward trend in the publication and citation of scientific outputs related to food security in developing countries. China has higher numbers of papers, patents, GDP, and food production index compared to Iran, Japan, and South Korea. There is also a positive correlation observed between population and the number of papers, gross production and the number of papers, food production and the number of published papers, as well as the number of patents and papers citing scientific outputs of countries.Conclusion: These results highlight the significant relationship between increasing scientific output, GDP, the number of patents, and food security. Greater emphasis on food security contributes to enhanced scientific output, GDP, and innovation. Similarly, increasing scientific output, GDP, and innovation positively impact food security in countries.Value: This study emphasizes the importance of scientific outputs in driving technological advancements, innovations, and ultimately, ensuring food security in developing countries.

Different ossificant materials have been used used for induction of bone repair in many studies, and bone matrix gelatin which contains bone morphogenic proteins one of the best ones.In present study we evaluated the role of this mat erial in acceleration of bone repair in rabbit tibia.A hole of 305mm diameter was made on right tibia of 10 and 12 rabbits as study and control group respectively, In the experiment group, in addittion to Bone Wax, we applied bone matrix glatin in the hole. Radiographic images were taken in days 0, 20, 40 and 53 after operation In 6 rabbits of each group, photographic pictures were also taken after exposure of entire bone. In 6 controls less degree of restoration were seen on day 53. In 4 experimental animals restoration were completed by this time and in 2 speciments repair processing were better then controls. This results shows that bone matrix gelatin can be used as an acclerator of bone repair.

Our analysis of Popper’s philosophy of science focuses on his concepts of tradition and situational analysis. These concepts represent innovative Popperian contributions to a historical and hermeneutical turn in philosophy of science that most of his critics, especially Kuhn, fail to recognize. According to his historical view, Popper conceives sciences as a complex of traditions in continuous transformation and progress by means of rational discussion of theories. In order to grasp the rational progress of scientific traditions, Popper proposes an original method that he calls “situational analysis”. This hermeneutical method seeks to understand the concepts, hypotheses, actions, practices, controversies and products that scientists made to solve problems in their specific historical contexts to improve the truth content of theories. In addition to his historical and hermeneutical turn, Popper also inquired about the social and political conditions for the progress of scientific traditions by means of intersubjective criticism of theories and conjectures. According to him, the rational discussion of ideas requires, as necessary conditions, plurality of ideas, intellectual humility, and freedom of thought and communication that can only exist in an open and democratic society. With these considerations, we may say that in addition to a historical and hermeneutical turn, Popper also contributed to a social and political turn in the philosophy of science